State v. Norgaard

OPINION

SMITH, JOHN, Judge

We affirm appellant Justin Kenneth Norgaard’s conviction for driving with an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more because the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of the Da-taMaster breath-test results.

FACTS

At approximately 1:37 a.m. on June 18, 2015, Officer Schmitz stopped a speeding vehicle. The driver of the vehicle, Nor-gaard, told Officer Schmitz that he was coming from a bar and had consumed too much alcohol to be driving. Officer Schmitz placed Norgaard under arrest and read the implied consent advisory, after which Norgaard…