Legal Opinion

Rail N Ranch Corporation v. State

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 3, 1966No. 2 CA-CIV 296PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants have taken this appeal from a “judgment” of dismissal entered in Pima County Superior Court as to fewer than all of the named defendants, appellees herein. On the authority of our recent decision in Pegler v. Sullivan, 4 Ariz.App. 149, 418 P.2d 395 (filed September 27, 1966), appellees have moved to dismiss the appeal as untimely.

The subject “judgment” recites in pertinent part:

“ * * * and as to them the Complaint is dismissed; and that judgment be, and it is hereby, entered in favor of the said defendants and against the plaintiffs.”

Rule 54(b), as amended, Arizona Rules of Civil…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Mehagian's Home Furnishings, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Mageary v. HoytArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Pegler v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mozes v. DaruCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  2. Bulova Watch Co. v. Super City Department Stores of Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. Connolly v. Great Basin Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  4. Rail N Ranch Corporation v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. Cordoba v. WiswallCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API