Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided June 8, 2004No. 0225031PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JEAN HARRISON CLEMENTS, Judge.

Donald E. Pearson was convicted in a bench trial of driving under the influence of alcohol, second offense, in violation of Code § 18.2-266. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred in admitting a certificate of blood analysis because, in having him take a blood test rather than a breath test, the arresting officer failed to comply with Virginia’s implied consent law. Finding no error, we affirm Pearson’s conviction.

I. BACKGROUND

In accordance with familiar principles of appellate review, we “state the evidence presented at trial in the light most favorable to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Blain v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  3. Johnson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  4. Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
  5. Bass v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
  2. Bryan Dunnington Cocke v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2017
  3. Danta Roberts, s/k/a Danta Omar Roberts v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  4. Dean Thomas Bradley v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  5. Lindsay Elizabeth Wade v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API