Legal Opinion

DUNHAM v. Davis

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 17, 1957No. 17369PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

232 S.C. 175 (1957)

101 S.E.2d 278

Elijah DUNHAM, William Dunham, Ben Dunham, Cecily D. Bethea, Floretta Dunham, William Graves, Irena G. Williams, Charlie Lee Wright, Annie Mae Wright, Mae Ola W. Brown, Gracie Wright, and Lou Thelma Johnson, Respondents,

v.

St. Clair DAVIS, Appellant.

17369

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

December 17, 1957.

Messrs. Woods & Woods and J. Malcolm McLendon, of Marion, for Appellant.

Messrs. J. Ralph Gasque, of Marion, and George W. Keels, of Florence, for Respondents.

The opinion of Judge Baker follows:

The background and origin of the present issues are to be found in…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dunham v. St. Clair DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  2. Tumbleston v. RumpelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
  3. Dunham v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  4. Kea v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Butler v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  2. South Carolina Pipeline Corp. v. Lone Star Steel Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Butler v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API