Legal Opinion
Estate of Arthur Dwight Haas, Deceased v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 29, 1980No. 78-1321PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS A. CLARK, Circuit Judge:
We are asked to decide whether the Estate of Arthur Dwight Haas (hereinafter the “Haas Estate”) is entitled to recover from Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. (hereinafter “MGM”) $20,665.84 which the appellant contends MGM improperly paid directly to Mr. Lewis Jeffrey Selznick, son of the late movie producer David 0. Selznick. The district court granted MGM’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that Mr. Haas had not properly notified MGM of the assignment under § 9-318(3) of the Uniform Commercial Code. We affirm.
As most filmgoers certainly know, David 0.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ertel v. Radio Corporation of AmericaIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
- First National Bank v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- First National Bank v. Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
3Cited by24 opinions
- Vacura v. Haar's Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Pioneer Commercial Funding Corp. v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Reading Co-Operative Bank v. Suffolk Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- Kirby v. Palos Verdes Escrow Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Buffalo Pipeline Co. v. Bell, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.