Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Mason

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1938No. 5887Published

1DissentLarson, Justice

I agree that the Produce Dealers Act, being chapter 4, Laws of Utah 1935, is a constitutional exercise of the legislative powers. That agriculture is, in this State, a business affected with a public interest, cannot be doubted. The State is interested in the welfare of its agricultural producers, not only because they make up a large part of the population, but because it is essential to the public welfare that the people be assured of a constant and sufficient food supply, and not dependent on foreign sources of supply. And, unless the farmer is assured such protection in his markets as to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. . the Commissioners of TaxesNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  2. Mente v. EisnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  3. State v. TophamUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Hutchings v. BurnetCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932
  5. State v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API