State v. Mason
Utah Supreme Court
1DissentLarson, Justice
I agree that the Produce Dealers Act, being chapter 4, Laws of Utah 1935, is a constitutional exercise of the legislative powers. That agriculture is, in this State, a business affected with a public interest, cannot be doubted. The State is interested in the welfare of its agricultural producers, not only because they make up a large part of the population, but because it is essential to the public welfare that the people be assured of a constant and sufficient food supply, and not dependent on foreign sources of supply. And, unless the farmer is assured such protection in his markets as to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hoyt v. . the Commissioners of TaxesNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Mente v. EisnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- State v. TophamUtah Supreme Court · 1912
- Hutchings v. BurnetCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.