Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Durant

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 2, 1926No. 16229PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

This is an action brought by the defendants in error, E. M. Durant and Alice Durant, plaintiffs in the trial court, against the plaintiff in error, Andy Higgins, as defendant, in the district court of Okfuskee county on the 29th and 30th days of September, 1924, for the purpose of recovering the sum of $2,-100 as the price and value of certain real estate. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

The cause was tried upon plaintiffs’ amended petition, which petition alleges that the defendant is justly indebted to them in the sum of $2,100, with…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Corrugated Culvert Co. v. Simpson Tp., McIntosh Cty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Fooshee v. CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. In Re Assessment of First National Bank of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Dill v. FlesherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Ford v. Ford's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Willis v. WillisWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. HarkeyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Price v. ClementSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API