Legal Opinion

United States v. Biasucci

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 17, 1986No. Nos. 459 to 464, 471 and 509, Dockets 85-1206 to 85-1212 and 85-1224PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MINER, Circuit Judge:

Eight defendants appeal from judgments of conviction entered following a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sand, J.) stemming from their involvement in a loansharking operation. Their principal contentions on this appeal are that certain videotapes recorded by a camera surreptitiously installed in a private business office should have been suppressed, that misconduct on the part of the prosecutor deprived them of a fair trial, that the trial court erroneously charged the jury on the state of mind the government must…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. United States v. Murad NersesianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Genty v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. EufrasioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. David Taketa and Thomas O'BrienCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API