Ford v. Allied Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OWEN, District Judge.
Appellant Allied Mutual Insurance Company (“Allied”) raises substantial questions as to Steven Ford and his family’s entitlement to receive from Allied, as his insurer, “under-insured” motor vehicle payments (“UIM”) following an accident with serious injuries. The appeal essentially involves the propriety of certain rulings by the district court on two summary judgment motions prior to trial. By those rulings, the court dismissed one defendant, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. (“Fidelity” or “USF & G”j, a potential insurer, and thereafter held as a matter of law…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Deepwater Investments, Limited v. Jackson Hole Ski Corporation and Paul M. McCollisterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Panis v. Mission Hills Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Scheetz v. IMT Ins. Co.(Mut.)Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- J. W. Denio Milling Co. v. MalinWyoming Supreme Court · 1917
- Pirkl v. Northwestern Mutual Insurance Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ford v. Allied Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996