Sorenson v. Hood
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Notwithstanding petitioner Brett Sorenson’s ineligibility for parole under his original sentence and 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1) (1987), he was properly released under 18 U.S.C. § 4163 upon the expiration of his term less good time credits and accordingly “deemed as if released on parole” under 18 U.S.C. § 4164. He therefore remained while on release under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Parole Commission. Martin v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 108 F.3d 1104, 1107 (9th Cir.1997); McQuerry v. U.S. Parole Comm’v, 961 F.2d 842, 845 (9th Cir.1992). And because we treat good time credits as “used up”…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sherman v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- James W. McQuerry v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Lewis L. Boniface v. P.M. Carlson, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Christopher John MARTIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997