Legal Opinion

Tuong Nguyen v. Smartervitamins Corporation

District Court, C.D. California

Decided October 16, 2023No. 8:21-cv-00832Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TUONG NGUYEN and SMARTER CASE NO. 8:21-CV-00832-DOC-ADS 11 NUTRITION, INC. 12 13 Plaintiff, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 14 vs. 15 SMARTERVITAMINS CORP., 16 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 I. INTRODUCTION 2 This action is a trademark dispute between two competing vitamin and supplement 3 companies. Plaintiffs, Smarternutrition, Inc. and Tuong Nguyen (“Plaintiffs” or “SNI”) 4 own the federally registered trademark for “Smarternutrition,” and sell a curcumin 5 supplement under the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Surfvivor Media, Inc. Peter S. Deptula v. Survivor Productions CBS Broadcasting Inc. CBS Worldwide, Inc. Wpc Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Arrow Fastener Co., Inc. v. The Stanley WorksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API