White v. Hampton
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Washington District Court. This case has been twice before in this court. (9 Iowa, 181; 10 Id., 238.) The questions now made arise between complainant and the holders of certain incumbrances on the lands included in the deed of trust made by Hampton; for which see the opinion. Respondents appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
1. It is first claimed that the trust-deed is inoperative, because of the failure of complainant to comply with and perform certain conditions set out in the instrument, without which, by its terms, it was to have no effect or force. We do not deem it necessary to follow counsel through the very many positions assumed under this head, to discuss whether the condition referred to is precedent or subsequent, nor whether complainant was sufficiently prompt and diligent in asserting his rights under the deed. ’ All these questions were presented by counsel when this case was last before us, were…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Benedict v. Gilman & CouchNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
- Whipple v. FarrarMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
- Leffler v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857
- Calvin v. BowmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
- Thatcher v. HaunSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bank of the State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863
- Johnson v. HarmonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- Case v. FantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
- Boyer v. Pahvant Mercantile & Investment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1930
- United States v. Cedar Valley Livestock Exchange, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.