State v. Loomis

Defendants contend that the evidence, which was largely circumstantial, was insufficient, under the rule as stated in Scott v. State, 190 Wis. 238, 208 N. W. 795, to support the verdict of guilty. Upon a review of the record, with that rule in mind, we are satisfied that the evidence amply supports the verdict. An extended discussion of the evidence will serve no useful purpose. It suffices to note that there was evidence to the following effect:

On the afternoon of December 17, 1933, Game Wardens McKeague and Jonas saw blood and deer hair on an automobile parked on a road in territory in…