Hare v. Young
Idaho Supreme Court
APPEAL from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, in and for the County of Bingham. Hon. J. M. Stevens, Judge. Suit to foreclose chattel mortgage. Judgment for plaintiffs. The registration act provides that the lease “must be filed of record in the same county recorder’s office or offices and within the same time and manner and for the same fee, as are chattel mortgages.”
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, in and for the County of Bingham. Hon. J. M. Stevens, Judge. Suit to foreclose chattel mortgage. Judgment for plaintiffs. The registration act provides that the lease “must be filed of record in the same county recorder’s office or offices and within the same time and manner and for the same fee, as are chattel mortgages.” There is no statutory provision for filing foreign chattel mortgages when the chattels are subsequently brought into this state. The chattel mortgage registration acts apply only to property in Idaho when the…
1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.
This is an appeal from the district court of the sixth judicial district of the state of Idaho, in and for the county of Bingham, and arises out of an action commenced in said court to foreclose a certain chattel mortgage made and executed by W. R. Young in favor of Anderson Brothers Bank, a corporation.
Prior to the commencement nf this action, the said note and mortgage were assigned to M. L. Hare and N. A. Just, and subsequent thereto and prior to the trial in the district court, the said N. A. Just died, and thereafter the respondent, James *685Jnst, as administrator of the estate of N. A.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Keith v. MaguireMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
3Cited by8 opinions
- Allen v. Blaine CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
- Taylor v. GirardIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
- Continental National Bank v. NaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
- Smith v. Consolidated Wagon & Machine Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1917
- Vaughan v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.