Legal Opinion

Monroe Abstract Corp. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided January 5, 1940No. Docket No. 95286Published

The taxpayer, engaged in the business of making and certifying abstracts of title, agreed with a title insurance company that in consideration of the latter's guaranteeing its title searches, it would deposit an amount equal to 5 percent of its income from title searches in a special reserve to cover possible losses arising out of those searches.

Read the full summary

The taxpayer, engaged in the business of making and certifying abstracts of title, agreed with a title insurance company that in consideration of the latter's guaranteeing its title searches, it would deposit an amount equal to 5 percent of its income from title searches in a special reserve to cover possible losses arising out of those searches. Amounts so deposited in the taxable year are held: (1) to be includable in taxable income because the subsequent use of or restrictions on income after receipt do not affect its taxability, (George Hyatt,36 B.T.A. 121, followed); (2) not to entitle…

1Opinion of the Court

MONROE ABSTRACT CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Monroe Abstract Corp. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 95286.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

41 B.T.A. 5; 1940 BTA LEXIS 1246;

January 5, 1940, Promulgated

The taxpayer, engaged in the business of making and certifying abstracts of title, agreed with a title insurance company that in consideration of the latter's guaranteeing its title searches, it would deposit an amount equal to 5 percent of its income from title searches in a special reserve to cover possible losses arising out of those searches. Amounts so…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Monroe Abstract Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1940
  2. Hyatt v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API