Christy v. Murphy
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Clerke, Justice.
It is now well established that the court Will grant an injunction against the use by one tradesman of the trade-marks of another, Will this protection be extended to enterprises undertaken for the purpose of affording amusement or recreation to the public 1
With regard to trade, it may be alleged that the interests of commerce and the encouragement of industry manifestly require and deserve the interposition of the court; while the well-being of society is not sufficiently concerned to require the extension of this species of protection to undertakings of which the main, if…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Glen & Hall Manufacturing Co. v. HallCommission of Appeals · 1874
- Corwin v. DalyThe Superior Court of New York City · 1860
- Hegeman & Co. v. HegemanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1880
- Mitchel H. Mark Realty Corp. v. HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Kingsley v. JacobyNew York Supreme Court · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.