Legal Opinion

Doughty v. Miller

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On final hearing on bill, answer and proofs taken orally.

1Opinion of the Court

Van Eleet, V. C.

This case stands in this anomalous condition : The complainant, in giving his evidence on the hearing, swore that the principal ground on which, by his bill, he rests his right to relief, has *530no foundation in fact. His bill was filed to procure a decree declaring that a deed, absolute on its face, was executed by him as a mortgage, and that inasmuch as he owed the grantee nothing then, and has not subsequently become indebted to her, the deed should be declared to be a nullity and a reconveyance ordered.

The facts which the complainant makes the foundation of his right to…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Strong v. StrongNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  2. ESB, INC. v. FischerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  3. Talcott, Inc. v. ROTO AMERICAN CORP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  4. Blaine v. KrysowatyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  5. Welsh v. Griffith-Prideaux, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API