Legal Opinion

Bethlehem Motors Corp. v. Flynt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1919PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs from Bryson, J., at May Term, 1919, of Foksytb:. It appears from tbe facts found by consent and from tbe admissions, affidavits and pleadings in tbe cause tbat tbe plaintiff, tbe Betblebem Motors Corporation, is engaged in tbe manufacture of Betblebem trucks in Pennsylvania, and tbat of tbe other plaintiffs tbe National Motor and Yebicle Company is engaged in tbe manufacture of tbe National automobile in Indiana; tbe W. Irving Young & Company is a…

Read the full summary

Appeal by plaintiffs from Bryson, J., at May Term, 1919, of Foksytb:. It appears from tbe facts found by consent and from tbe admissions, affidavits and pleadings in tbe cause tbat tbe plaintiff, tbe Betblebem Motors Corporation, is engaged in tbe manufacture of Betblebem trucks in Pennsylvania, and tbat of tbe other plaintiffs tbe National Motor and Yebicle Company is engaged in tbe manufacture of tbe National automobile in Indiana; tbe W. Irving Young & Company is a corporation of Maryland; tbat tbe Liberty Motors Corporation is incorporated in this State with its office in Winston, and…

1Opinion of the CourtCiARK, C. J.

Tbe facts being practically admitted, the real question before the Court is whether section 72, chapter 231, Laws 1917, is constitutional.

As found by the court, the trucks and automobiles consigned to the Liberty Motor Corporation and the National Motor Company by the other plaintiffs are sold direct by such consignees from their storage warehouses in this State. They are consigned to them for that purpose, and not to be used exclusively as samples or for demonstration purposes, and the court finds from the testimony that purchasers were obtained here by the said consignee companies, the cars…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Blake v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. American Sugar Refining Co. v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Singer Sewing MacHine Co. v. BrickellSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Western Turf Assn. v. GreenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Life Casualty Co. of Tennessee v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Jernigan v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. In Re the Appeal of Carolina Quality Block Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. City of Cape Girardeau v. Harris Truck & Trailer Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API