Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Pincus

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1995No. 94-2348PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings of misconduct. We also agree with its recommendation, but with some modification.

Under Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A), attorneys in this state are subject to an automatic interim suspension from the practice of law upon conviction of a felony; however, in respondent’s case, no order of interim suspension was ever issued.1 Notwithstanding this, respondent stopped practicing law voluntarily at least as of his sentencing in December 1993 because he no longer trusted his commitment to his clients or his judgment on their behalf. For this reason, we…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stark County Bar Ass'n v. ZimmerOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. PincusOhio Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API