Legal Opinion

People v. Morris

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 2, 1994No. Nos. 3-93-0121, 3-93-0130; 3-93-0132 consPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCUSKEY

The defendant, David Morris, appeals from the denial of his motion to reconsider his sentences. The sentences were imposed after the defendant pleaded guilty to seven offenses. The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the cause should be remanded for further proceedings regarding the defendant’s motion to reconsider his sentences because his trial counsel did not file a certificate as required by Supreme Court Rule 604(d) (Rule 604(d)) (134 Ill. 2d R. 604(d) (amended April 1, 1992, effective August 1, 1992)). Based upon our supreme court’s decision in People v. Janes (1994), 158 Ill. 2d 27,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. JanesIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. VickeryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. People v. ReedAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. People v. GilsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People of State of Illinois v. ShirleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  2. People v. ShirleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API