Legal Opinion
Harzinski v. Village of Endicott
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 3, 1981PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*306OPINION OF THE COURT
Sweeney, J.
These appeals involve two separate actions for declaratory judgments regarding the amount of benefits that must be paid pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 207-a of the General Municipal Law by a municipality to disabled firemen who are receiving accidental disability retirement allowances. A resolution of the issues necessitates an analysis and interpretation of subdivision 2 of section 207-a of the General Municipal Law.
Prior to the amendment of section 207-a of the General Municipal Law (L 1977, ch 965, § 1), the statute was interpreted as requiring the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pease v. ColucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- In Re the Accounting of BarryNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Drahos v. Village of Johnson CityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Chalachan v. City of BinghamtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Ralston Purina Co. v. Siegel's Poultry, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mashnouk v. MilesNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Farber v. City of UticaNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Kuzma v. City of BinghamtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983