Legal Opinion

Peterson v. United States

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 24, 1990No. 88 C 5080PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

SHADUR, District Judge.

This action was begun and has continued in the typical pattern followed by lawsuits dealing with withholding taxes: Robert Peterson (“Robert”) initially sued for a refund of the small amount of such taxes that he had paid, and the United States then counterclaimed against him and his brother John Peterson (“John”) for the much larger amount of withholding taxes unpaid by the brothers’ corporation (asserting that each was a “responsible person” within the meaning of the relevant statute).

This Court conducted a bench trial to deal…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anthony A. Calderone, Clark Hornbaker, Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  2. Slodov v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Robert W. Monday v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. John A. Monday, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  4. Mazo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. Waymon Leon Howard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. LandauDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  2. Anderson v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
  3. United States v. WITKEMPERDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API