Henrich v. Newell
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRudo'Dph, J.
This action was 'brought to' determine the rights of the parties in and to the S. E. %. of section 8, township 95, range 49, Union county, S. D. The plaintiffs in this action are Maude V. Henrich, Fannie M. Humphrey, Eva R. Holleman, and Florence I. Bradley. Frederick L. Newell is a party defendant; made such ¡because he refused to become a party plaintiff. The facts are not disputed. The controversy is among the heirs of Robert Newell and Martha Newell, deceased. Robert Newell died intestate in Union county, S. D., on or about December 4, 1903, and Martha Newell died testate in Union county,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re the Estate of GarcelonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Wickersham v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Estate of RyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Evenson v. WebsterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- Dobbs v. Atlas Elevator Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schutterle v. SchutterleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Hoffman v. GregorySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Neuharth v. BrunzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Ware v. CrowellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
- In Re McGillick's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.