Legal Opinion
Hungerford v. United States
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 18, 1961No. Civ. 8122PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALBERT, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action against the United States and twenty fictitious defendants. The United States has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction, and for failure to state a cause of action (Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b), 28 U.S.C.A.). The United States has also filed a motion to strike certain portions of plaintiff’s complaint. In view of the conclusion reached on the motion to dismiss, the motion to strike becomes moot.
According to the allegations of his complaint, plaintiff was injured in combat while serving in the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Tom D. Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- United States v. Wilroy ReidCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- James B. Stanley v. Central Intelligence Agency United States Department of Defense U.S. ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Lee Quinton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- Thornwell v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979
- Everett v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.