Legal Opinion

Nottolini v. La Salle National Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 9, 2003No. 2 — 01 — 1380PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kapala

The instant controversy arose after defendants, La Salle National Bank, trustee under trust No. 39201, and William Dwyer, erected a fence between a water-filled quarry that they owned and a vacant lot that plaintiffs, Rick Nottolini, Cheryl Nottolini, and Alecia Nottolini, owned in South Elgin. The fence prevented plaintiffs from accessing the water-filled quarry from their property. Plaintiffs thereafter filed a complaint in the circuit court of Kane County alleging that the defendants’ quarry was a lake and that they had rights to use the lake because a portion of the water from the lake…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Humphreys-Mexia Co. v. ArseneauxTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Moore v. Bridgewater Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Beacham v. Lake Zurich Property Owners Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Block v. FranzenNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Ours v. Grace Property, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alderson v. FatlanIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Alderson v. FatlanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. Bohne v. La Salle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. Murawski v. ReidDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. Holm v. KodatIllinois Supreme Court · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API