Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex Parte B.F.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 28, 2000No. 1981009Published

1DissentMaddox, Justice

I respectfully dissent. Because the majority does not issue an opinion explaining the factual and procedural background of this case, I will briefly set out the facts and then explain why those facts and my understanding of the law applicable to this case compel me to dissent.

I. Facts and Procedural History

In October 1996, L.C. (“the birth mother”), who was not married at the time, gave birth to the child that is the subject of this controversy. The birth mother and her parents decided to put the baby up for adoption and, through an intermediary, met L.J. (“the adoptive mother”). On October…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gaston v. AmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. League v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Dominex, Inc. v. KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Smith v. Style Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Cougar Min. Co. v. MINERAL LAND & MIN. CONSULT. INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API