People v. Workman
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendant was convicted of the crime of perjury in the first degree for testifying falsely before a Grand Jury. The People established beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant had given false answers in a questionnaire which he had submitted to the Grand Jury.
The questionnaire had been prepared by the District Attorney and contained sixty-eight numbered answers. Before a charge of perjury is predicated upon the answers in such a questionnaire, the questions should be clear, simple, direct and unambiguous. They should be phrased so that a person of average intelligence may determine exactly…
2Cited by6 opinions
- People v. BenoitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- People v. RothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- People ex rel. Sillifant v. SheriffNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- People ex rel. Sillifant v. SheriffNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- People v. AlbroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.