Legal Opinion

2837 Bailey Corp. v. Gould

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 27, 1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Special Term erred in denying defendant’s motion to vacate a default judgment entered against him for damages to plaintiff’s property. Plaintiff sought to effect "nail and mail” service of process pursuant to CPLR 308 (4). Defendant challenged the propriety of the service and argued that the default judgment was void for lack of jurisdiction (CPLR 5015 [a] [4]).

To effect substituted service under CPLR 308 (4), the summons must be affixed to the door of defendant’s "actual place of business, dwelling place or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Feinstein v. BergnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Sapienza v. HaagAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. CSC Holdings, Inc. v. FungDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
  2. Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. KhondokerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. LESNIAK, HILARY v. WELLS FARGO BANK NAAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Dunn v. BurnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Citibank (South Dakota) N. A. v. FarmerMount Vernon City Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API