Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Montgomery

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 25, 1943No. 6 Div. 46PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is a proceeding to review the conviction and sentence of petitioner an attorney at law by the Board of Commissioners of the Alabama State Bar by whom he was suspended from the practice for two years, and that he then be automatically reinstated. He was found guilty of the charges generally, without specifying any particular charge, by a vote of twelve yeas and seven nays.

Charges 1, 3 and 5 were that certain conduct of his was contrary to section 63, Title 14, Code of 1940, and charges 2, 4 and 6 were that the same conduct was contrary to section 73, Title 14, Code, supra.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Ex Parte ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In re Abella BlancoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
  2. Hope for Families & Community Service, Inc. v. WarrenDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2010
  3. Ex Parte CookeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. Maddox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  5. Dowling v. Alabama State BarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API