Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bull v. Bearden

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 5, 1913Published

1DissentConner, C. J.

It will be noted that the petition of the plaintiffs set out in the opinion of the majority contains no allegation that the defendants have injured, or in any way threaten to injure, the property for the possession of which the plaintiffs sue; the injury complained of being a threatened loss of its rental value. The damages thus arising are fully protected by the terms of the bond given upon appeal to the county court, which the petition confesses was duly approved by the justice of the peace. See article 3957, Revised Statutes 1911. The insolvency of the sureties on this bond is averred only…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Texas Trunk Ry. Co. v. Lewis, SheriffTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. City of Victoria v. SchottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  3. Lazarus v. SwaffordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  4. Arthur v. BatteTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Melvin v. Chancy, GuardianCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API