Legal Opinion

American Button-Hole, Overseaming & Sewing-Machine Co. v. Thornton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 12, 1881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of the municipal court of St. Paul, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

Appeal by defendants from an order of the municipal court of St. Paul, refusing a new trial. The action was brought in that court to recover the price of sewing-machines sold by plaintiff to defendants. The complaint contains statements, in three counts, of several causes of action. In the first is alleged a sale, November 24, 1879, of sewing-machines at the agreed price of $24, and upon a credit of six months, with allegations of a demand after the expiration of such period of credit. In the two succeeding counts, respectively, are set forth, in the same manner, sales of like property made…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Secor v. . SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1858

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Memmer v. CareySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Williams v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Banner Grain Co. v. Burr Farmers Elevator & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Alkire Grocer Co. v. TagartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API