Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kelley v. Earle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 25, 1935No. 159, Miscellaneous Docket 6Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mk. Justice Maxey :

The majority opinion holds the General State Authority Act breaches the state Constitution in only one respect and that is, that it creates a debt contrary to the prohibition of section 4, article IX, of the Constitution. On the record now before us — and that alone is what our decision must be based on — I am clear that section 4, article IX, is not breached and I dissent from the conclusion arrived at by the majority.

The majority says: “We are of the opinion that the lease which the Commonwealth propo’ses to execute, . . . and other leases like it…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MoirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schnader v. LiverightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Appeal of the City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  4. Keller v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  5. Erie & North-East Railroad v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API