Kelley v. Earle
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Mk. Justice Maxey :
The majority opinion holds the General State Authority Act breaches the state Constitution in only one respect and that is, that it creates a debt contrary to the prohibition of section 4, article IX, of the Constitution. On the record now before us — and that alone is what our decision must be based on — I am clear that section 4, article IX, is not breached and I dissent from the conclusion arrived at by the majority.
The majority says: “We are of the opinion that the lease which the Commonwealth propo’ses to execute, . . . and other leases like it…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MoirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schnader v. LiverightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Appeal of the City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
- Keller v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Erie & North-East Railroad v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.