Legal Opinion

STEIDLEY v. SINGER

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 24, 2017No. Case Number: 114534PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, J.:

¶ 1 The dispositive issue is whether the Oklahoma Citizens Participation Act (the OCPA), 12 O.S. Supp. 2014 1430 et seq., 1 which became effective November 1, 2014, retroactively applies to this cause. We hold that it does not.

FACTS

¶ 2 On October 16, 2013, the plaintiff/appellants, Janice Steidley, the District Attorney for Rogers County, Oklahoma, David Iski, the Assistant District Attorney for Tulsa County, Oklahoma, and M. Bryce Lair, the Assistant District Attorney for Craig County, Oklahoma (District Attorneys) filed a lawsuit against several individual citizens in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams Companies v. DunkelgodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. Forest Oil Corp. v. Corporation Com'n of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Cole v. Silverado Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. King Manufacturing v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  5. ANAGNOST v. TOMECEKSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. ANAGNOST v. TOMECEKSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  2. KRIMBILL v. TALARICOCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
  3. THACKER v. WALTONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2020
  4. THACKER v. WALTONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2021
  5. THACKER v. WALTONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API