Rake v. Spall
New York Family Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Marilyn L. O’Connor, J.
Respondent’s motion herein raises the important question of *365the nature of notice required in order for a default order of incarceration to result from a support order violation proceeding. The Support Magistrate found by default that respondent willfully violated the support order made for the benefit of E.S. He recommended the sanction of incarceration. The matter was duly transferred for a judicial confirmation of the willful violation finding and the imposition of a sanction. This court confirmed the findings and ordered respondent incarcerated. A…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Marine Midland Bank v. John E. Russo Produce Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Commissioner of Social Services v. Philip De G.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Noce v. KaufmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- The People v. . HoveyNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Rake v. SpallNew York Family Court, Monroe County · 2005