Cox v. Stults Eagle Drug Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.
The purpose of this action is to test the validity of House Bill No. 146, commonly known as the “Privilege-Sales Tax” which was certified to the Secretary of State as one of the acts passed by the eleventh legislature. The plaintiff, Stults Eagle Drug Company, a corporation, filed a complaint against the state officers charged with its enforcement seeking to secure from the court a declaratory judgment determining whether it was passed in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution, and, if it was, whether it is now in effect or will become so only after the expiration of ninety days…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Green v. WellerMississippi Supreme Court · 1856
- Norman v. Kentucky Board of ManagersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
- Allen v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1913
- Cohn v. KingsleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1897
- Johnson v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1909
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Renck v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Plumley v. HaleAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- State Ex Rel. La Prade v. CoxArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Brewer v. BurnsArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- Garvey v. TrewArizona Supreme Court · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.