Legal Opinion
Daniel v. Daniel
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided April 3, 1838PublishedCited by 7 opinions
From the Circuit Court for Montgomery County. Covenant and Arbitration.
1Opinion of the Court
Judge Marshall
delivered the Opinion of the Court.
To an action of covenant, for alleged breach of warranty-in a conveyance of land, brought by Jesse Daniel against Henry Daniel, the latter pleaded various pleas, bringing into view several matters of account and set off between them.
At the September term, 1836, of the MontgomeryjCircuit Court, the cause, by consent, was referred to - Richard Apperson and L. Y. Millspaugh, or their umpire. And at the September term, 1836, the two arbitrators returned their award, as made under an order of the Court at its preceding March term, and therein…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Day v. . HammondNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Ingraham v. WhitmoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Royse's adm'r v. McCallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1869
- Dennis v. Standard Fire InsuranceNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919
- Blanton v. GaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1845
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.