Legal Opinion

Vine v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 2010No. 49 MAP 2009PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.

This appeal involves the statutory immunity afforded to third parties who act on the instructions of an attorney-in-fact. More specifically, we consider the position of the State Employees’ Retirement System Board that immunity is conferred even where the power of attorney is void or voidable.

*651Appellant Teresa Vine worked for the Commonwealth for 29 years and is a member of the State Employees’ Retirement System (“SERS”). On January 24, 1998, she was involved in an automobile accident in Virginia and sustained severe injuries resulting in paraplegia. Two days later, on…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. United States v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Small v. HornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Dexter v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Governor's Office v. Office of Open Records, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. In re BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Mercury Trucking, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Bennett v. Bank of America National Assoc. (In re Bennett)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Estate of Gritser, W. Appeal of: Scott, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API