Legal Opinion

People v. Pitts

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1970No. Docket 1,277PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted by a jury of breaking and entering a motor vehicle with intent to commit larceny therein. MCLA § 750.356a [Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.588(1)]. On appeal, defendant contends that the complaint was insufficient because the complaining witness did not have personal knowledge of defendant’s participation in the crime. Contrary to defendant’s claim, however, it is well established that such personal knowledge is not required for a valid felony complaint. A felony complaint which, upon its face, purports to be made upon the knowledge of the affiant is sufficient. People v.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. People v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  5. People v. FarmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. HooksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API