Legal Opinion

Paul v. McCudden

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1970PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff was awarded a jury verdict for $10,000 general damages and $15,000 punitive damages for an alleged assault committed on plaintiff by defendant’s agents. During the trial, defendant failed to move for a directed verdict and failed to except to any of the instructions given by the trial court and does not otherwise call to our attention any alleged errors of the trial court made at any time during the trial. Later defendant moved for a new trial on the sole ground that there was no evidence to sustain the verdict. The motion was denied. Defendant’s appeal claims the trial court erred…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schafer v. Fraser Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State v. Foot YouOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Giachetta v. MarquamOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Wills v. PETROSOregon Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Turman v. Central Billing Bureau, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Baumbach v. PooleOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Erwin v. ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Johnson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. Stuart v. KelsayOregon Supreme Court · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API