Legal Opinion

In re Siegel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 2, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Petitioner, Departmental Disciplinary Committee, moves to confirm the referee’s report herein insofar as it finds that respondent was convicted of serious crimes, to otherwise disaffirm the report and for the entry of an order suspending the respondent from the practice of law for not less than three years, and respondent cross-moves to confirm the referee’s report in its entirety.

Respondent was admitted to practice in this department in 1942, and has maintained an office for the practice of law within this department. On October 15, 1982, respondent was convicted in the…

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of WeissmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. Matter of WeissmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. In re CaparrosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API