Legal Opinion

Dillett v. Kemble

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1874PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On final hearing on pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

One of the tiro points made in this cause, and which were ■argued very elaborately before me, was passed upon by the late ■Chancellor, as appears by bis opinion in Dillett v. Kemble, 8 C. E. Green 58. He there held that the complainant had no ■ title U> relief on the ground of mistake. I fully concur in that opinion. The complainant’s mix,take was the result of culpable negligence. He took the title to land he had purchased, paid the consideration money, and built upon the property, before lie discovered that it was “subject to the lien of the judgment, the payment of which the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Conduit Found. Corp. v. City of Atlantic CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  2. Dupont Chemical Co. v. BuckleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
  3. Fidelity Chemical Products Corp. v. RubinoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API