Legal Opinion

Brown v. Farmers Mut. Fire Ins. Ass'n.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 12, 1936No. 14253PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

The amended complaint sets forth that in August, 1920, Eph A. Brown and Mary Brown, his wife, procured from the appellant a policy by which their dwelling house was insured against loss by fire in the sum of $300.00; loss, if any, payable to Joseph Wylie & Co., a corporation, as its interest might appear. It is further alleged that the insured, being still indebted to Joseph Wylie & Co. in July, 1923, they conveyed the insured premises to it, and simultaneously Wylie & Co. entered into an agreement with Eph and Mary Brown to reconvey…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pearlstine v. Westchester Fire Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  2. Norris v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
  3. Young v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  4. Schroeder v. Springfield Fire & Marine Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
  5. Jeffords v. Tokio Marine Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Waltz v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  2. Waltz v. EQUIT. ASSUR. SOC. OF THE USSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API