Legal Opinion

State v. Dooley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Union: J. W. Knowles, Judge. In Banc.

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

1. The defendant was indicted, jointly with T. J. Keelen, charged with the crime of larceny by stealing a Ford automobile belonging to one George Robertson. Upon his separate trial, he was convicted of the crime as charged in the indictment. Section 1947, Or. L., defines the crime with which the defendant was charged. This section was designed to cover only those cases which would have been larceny at common law. All of the essential features which were necessary to establish larceny at common law are still requisite to sustain a convic*565tion under this statute, among which is the requirement…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Smith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1894
  4. State v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. TauscherOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State v. SpearsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. StuartOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. StuartOregon Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API