Legal Opinion
In Re Boehm
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
Decided August 30, 2000No. Bankruptcy 99-16308-9P7PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON CLAIMANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OR CLARIFICATION OF ORDER ALLOWING CLAIM NO. 6 (DOC. NO. 48)
ALEXANDER L. PASKAY, Bankruptcy Judge.
THE MATTER under consideration in this Chapter 7 ease is Claimant Peninsula Bank’s (Peninsula) Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification of this Court’s Order Overruling Trustee’s Objection to Claim No. 6 (Doc. No. 43), entered on April 13, 2000. Claim No. 6 was filed as a general unsecured claim in the amount of $87,-721.13. While this Court allowed Claim No. 6, this Court also ruled that Peninsula is not entitled to a dividend unless there is a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Coastal Alaska Lines, Inc., Debtor. Zidell, Inc. v. Daniel E. Forsch, Esq., TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- In Re the Charter Company, Debtors. The Charter Company and Charter Oil Company v. DioxinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Ford Business Forms, Inc. v. Sure Card, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1994
- Matter of ScottUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1986
- Matter of EustonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1990
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re PetrucciUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- In Re HayesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2005
- In re McCutchenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2015