Legal Opinion

Plewes v. Philadelphia Casualty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 29, 1904Published

Action by Stanley E. Plewes against the Philadelphia Casualty Company.

1Per curiam

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Held, that while the complaint contains some allegations appropriate only in an action upon contract for services, yet it contains all the allegations necessary to constitute a cause of action for damages for breach of the contract. The cause of action may be regarded by this court as one for damages,- and the other allegations disregarded as surplusage. The amount of the recovery under the evidence would be practically the same in either form of action. The distinction between the two, under the facts of this case, is technical rather than real.

McLENNA…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Perry v. . DickersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Weed v. . BurtNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Dexter v. . IvinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API