Legal Opinion

Rabinowitz v. Debow

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 17, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Trenchard, J.

This is a vendee’s suit against a vendor to recover back money deposited on account of a contract for the sale of real estate, and for consequential damages based on the value of the bargain.

At the trial a verdict was directed for the plaintiff for the amount of the down money and interest, and for the defendant on the count for damages for the loss of the bargain. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered upon the verdict directed for the defendant.

The sole question on this appeal is whether or not, under the evidence, it was open…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cohen v. Cyzam Realty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. St. Pius X House of Retreats v. CAMDEN DIOCESE NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Kammert Bros. Enterprises, Inc. v. Tanque Verde Plaza Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Earlin v. MorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  4. Donovan v. BachstadtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  5. Katin v. CrispelAtlantic County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API