Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Pixley

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided September 20, 2019No. 1:16-cv-00189Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division Deonta Jerome Hicks ) Plaintiff, ) v. 1:16cv189 (CMH/IDD) Wendall W. Pixley, et al., Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Deonta Jerome Hicks, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action alleging violations of his religious rights under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), see 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-2, and the First Amendment, see 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The defendants filed a Second Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment, supported by a legal memorandum in which…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Robert Louis Roseboro v. Sam P. Garrison, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Warden of Central PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  4. Adrian King, Jr. v. Jim RubensteinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  5. Overton v. BazzettaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API