Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Papy

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 2, 1978No. 50810PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

358 So.2d 4 (1978)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

Hugh R. PAPY, Respondent.

No. 50810.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 2, 1978.

Rehearing Denied May 11, 1978.

Alfred K. Frigola, Bar Counsel, Marathon and James P. Hollaway, Asst. Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, for The Florida Bar, complainant.

James E. Tribble, of Blackwell, Walker, Gray, Powers, Flick & Hoehl, Miami and Magill, Sevier & Reed, Miami, for respondent.

2Per curiam

This disciplinary proceeding by The Florida Bar against respondent, Hugh R. Papy, a member of The Florida Bar, is before us on complaint of The Florida Bar, report of the referee and petition…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. BassSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. The Florida Bar v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  3. State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. OxfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  4. The Florida Bar v. RandolphSupreme Court of Florida · 1970

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. VannierSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Matter of WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Louisiana Bar Ass'n v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  4. The Florida Bar v. RubinSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  5. The Florida Bar v. GlickSupreme Court of Florida · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API