International Business MacHines Corp. v. Charnes
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carrigan
The Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Revenue (Director) determined that International Business Machine Corporation (IBM) is liable for use tax upon the “capitalized cost” or “full finished goods cost” of items it withdraws from its work in process and sales inventories and diverts to its own intracompany use within Colorado.
After a trial de novo, the district court reversed, holding that a use tax may be imposed upon only the “materials cost” of such items diverted for internal use. The Director had asserted the use tax against the higher “full finished goods cost” or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. ReilySupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- City and County of Denver v. SweetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- Bedford v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1938
- Carpenter v. Carman Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1943
- Matthews v. State, Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- A.B. Hirschfeld Press, Inc. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- General Motors Corp. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Howard Electrical & Mechanical, Inc. v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Winslow Construction Co. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- CF & I. STEEL CORP. v. CharnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.