Legal Opinion
United States v. Venable
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 21, 2006No. CRIM.A.00-0038(CKK)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Due to the unusual circumstances of this case, which revolves around Defendant’s alleged violation of the terms of his supervised release with less than one (1) month left in his release period, the Court is presented with three questions of first impression within this jurisdiction. Specifically, the Court must determine:
1. Does the issuance of a warrant for a violation of supervised release toll the period of supervised release and/or ensure that the Court retains power to hold a hearing on the violation (“HOV”) after the expiration of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Jack Moody Stricklin, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Larry J. MeeksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. JanvierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Floyd v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- United States v. BarryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Yansane v. WardenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026